Gossamer is an implementation of the Polkadot Host, developed using Go. As an alternative client implementation, it serves decentralization and robustness of the network by being a full node and a validator node. Ultimately, Gosammer is a framework for building within the Polkadot ecosystem, uniquely positioned to accelerate Golang development and offer additional advantages and capabilities.
Gossamer is built by ChainSafe Systems, a blockchain R&D company specializing in protocol engineering and web3 infrastructure that has been building within the Polkadot ecosystem for years, along with Filecoin and Ethereum.
Full proposal: Gossamer Full Proposal (IPFS) | Gossamer Full Proposal (GDrive)
This proposal requests to continue supporting Gossamer development for the next 12 months. With years of dedication, the team's expertise has gained significant traction. This continued support would leverage their extensive experience to sustain and enhance the project’s development, building on successful foundations.
The next 12 months will be crucial for Gossamer as it reaches significant user-facing milestones like full node and validator node capabilities while discovering its potential and value within the Go development ecosystem.
Larger milestones that Gossamer will achieve in the estimated period:
Q2/Q3/Q4 2024
Q1/Q2 2025
Timeline and milestone details can be found in the Gossamer Full Proposal document.
Requested Funding: 368,016 DOT
Beneficiary Account: 149mJjdQjEBMHHbWDjbLJ7X4e95ps6L35DZVaBzn1raR1EVQ
—
We are always open for conversation, so for any questions, thoughts, or feedback, feel free to reach out! You can always contact us at [email protected].
Thank you,
Gossamer Team
149mJjdQjEBMHHbWDjbLJ7X4e95ps6L35DZVaBzn1raR1EVQ
.Should be great to change the name or at least to something more easy to remember or more standard like polkadot-js polkadot-py polkadot-go in this particular case
Thank you for the proposal. Client diversity cannot be compromised. However, it's clear from the announcements and presentations on JAM so far that a relay chain implementation is probably going to be made redundant by the forthcoming development efforts. Spending more funds on an unfinished relay chain client implementation seems to be a futile effort, in my humble opinion. I would be happy to change my vote according to direction from the technical leadership of the relay chain efforts, but until then my vote is nay.
Please let me know if you are in contact with the development team regarding this proposal's position in the light of the coming transition.
Best regards,
kukabi | Helikon
Edited