Referendum #709

Ongoing Development of Gossamer (16 months)

Big Spender
8 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up 1
Share
Request
368.02KDOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation7d
Attempts
1
Tally
71.2%Aye
50.0%Threshold
28.8%Nay
Aye
22.15MDOT
Nay
8.95MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.46%)
6.47MDOT
Issuance
1.42BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline6
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments
Sort by
Oldest
[Deleted Account]

Thank you for the proposal. Client diversity cannot be compromised. However, it's clear from the announcements and presentations on JAM so far that a relay chain implementation is probably going to be made redundant by the forthcoming development efforts. Spending more funds on an unfinished relay chain client implementation seems to be a futile effort, in my humble opinion. I would be happy to change my vote according to direction from the technical leadership of the relay chain efforts, but until then my vote is nay.

Please let me know if you are in contact with the development team regarding this proposal's position in the light of the coming transition.

Best regards,
kukabi | Helikon

Edited

Reply
Up
[Deleted Account]

Should be great to change the name or at least to something more easy to remember or more standard like polkadot-js polkadot-py polkadot-go in this particular case

Reply
Up