I would love to understand the rationale behind the current **NAY** voters - if it wasn't already clear enough, this request is for delivery of pre-approved milestones under gov1. imo it sends a really bad message if we start breaking these social contracts and not rewarding teams who are delivering on agreed tasks.

[@lolmcshizz](149AQApEw4Xe1DxWesqywiuGQHazbETMgWgT89WjEYFAc29y-polkadot) 

People vote NAY because they see this proposal as a waste of money. And it probably is.

There were few hundred people visiting yieldbay, but we don't know if even a single person used the service. 

A yield aggregator should be a product that makes money with customers, not via the treasury. (treasury should be for infrastructure / proof of concept stuff).

Many people voting NAY never approved the gov1 proposal and don't feel bound by the previous decision.

FYI: I voted AYE

**Proponent:** 16m9GvS9aYsepHTmZTMbJmc8Z5ZNGJ4D3ySqLE349Li7rKvY (YieldBay Treasury, Polkadot)

**Requested Payment Amount:** 15,375.745 DOT ($80,000 @ $5.203)

In March 2023, YieldBay proposed to create Polkadot first central yield farming dashboard across 3 milestones, approved through Council [Motion #355](https://polkadot.subsquare.io/council/motion/355) under Gov1.

YieldBay currently monitors 183 yield farms across 17 protocols tracking $33M, including collaborations with Interlay, Stellaswap, Arthswap, Mangata, Kintsugi among others.

Objective of this proposal is to provide you with a detailed delivery report for Milestone 2, 3 to request 15,375.745 DOT that can be found [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/106gnRv8uxJyyU4xbwHNPFc6c97UR1qqYk5FE5tf6XQU/edit).

Read more about our initial Treasury Proposal [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GQQOEZ3ZW3wQ9GH0fv7na8evmBcBc_Tamf2ulor2bqI/edit?usp=sharing).

Milestone 2 and 3 Payment Request – YieldBay: Polkadot’s yield farming dashboard