Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our **second** vote on this proposal is **AYE**.

The **Big Tipper** track requires **35% participation and simple majority of non-abstain votes** according to our [voting policy v0.2](https://docs.permanence.io/voting_policy/voting_policy_v0.2.html), and any referendum in which the **majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote**. This proposal has received **three aye and zero nay** votes from **ten available members**. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

> Voters expressed their support for the proposal, highlighting the significant value of the off-chain data and its potential worth. Gratitude was specifically extended to an individual for their service in facilitating the process.

The full discussion can be found in our [internal voting](https://voting.opensquare.io/space/permanence/proposal/QmVHHA2rChDGftJ7fF5tPzZK1C6ALQEGNLTykv9n3K7uye).

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards, Permanence DAO Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate 📅 [Book Office Hours](https://cal.com/permanencedao/office-hours) 💬 [Public Telegram](https://t.me/permanencedao) 🌐️ [Web](https://permanence.io) 🐦 [Twitter](https://twitter.com/permanencedao) 🗳️ [Delegate](https://polkadot.subsquare.io/user/15ubZj6T7NUYyQw6j4XBkEMJ2vew5w9kqKEcN1QG7Z1weKDV/votes)

[@PERMANENCE DAO/GOV-PROXY](13znFMMjHyM2UvSewvaKMC2bLUcySRMzcM8BAMTzm1G2P5ju-polkadot) 

Thank you for your continued support and encouragements! 🙏🏿

Hi Anaelle, 

Thank you for your work.

The problem is that there is inaccurate information because you are entering the data manually. For example, the curators are receiving around $1,200 for Moderation Bounty instead of the $135 you mention, and the list of current curators is not updated. This is just one example, but there are more.

On the other hand, I have noticed that some members are participating in five bounties, which suggests a certain level of concentration.

Does anyone know why these curators charge such high amounts?
Community Events: $4,000 per month per curator
Polkadot Assurance Legion Bounty: $3,000 per month per curator.
Marketing Bounty: €3,925–€14,700 per month per curator.

It would also be interesting to know whether these curators keep the payments or sell them.

[@13Vg...fwXX](13Vgth41V1LDFC8QMekSpN2At6SPKtFmTDLNZyzHZhvsfwXX-polkadot) 

Hello there,

Thank you for the appreciation.

I would like to use this opportunity to highlight what goes on in the creation of the HR databases and showcase what is involved concretely, and why this info is valuable.

You said: “ For example, the curators are receiving around $1,200 for Moderation Bounty instead of the $135 you mention, and the list of current curators is not updated.”
But this is an incorrect reading of the data presented.

The Bounties HR entry is about the **curation team** behind the Moderation bounty, it is not about moderators. 
![Modbountyinfo.JPG](https://subsquare.infura-ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXybYf9DayfoEMsmhjRXUf6ohCxJ5srfKxrvdVbayZCpR)

And so, the entry was populated based on the following information collected from the 2nd top up proposal:

![ModbountyMichalis.JPG](https://subsquare.infura-ipfs.io/ipfs/QmSKUiJW8DSCbTfGCoUBBVoNT3fsan4tNu4jysj4xAW4Pk)
![ModbountyMsig.JPG](https://subsquare.infura-ipfs.io/ipfs/QmZh5YuQDQdrGpoZE28BVZgXZFr2Y5XZKkVJHDB6uemRqV)


1) Michalis is indeed a curator for the Moderation bounty, though he is not paid.

![ModbountyCuratorsalary.JPG](https://subsquare.infura-ipfs.io/ipfs/QmcBmCYU4tcUxEeFw5NMpWQ8UTLf4Fw7Q5AAP9eq1M92U6)

2) The two moderator-curators are paid $1535 for both their moderation and curation duties, which is $135 (i.e. $1535 - $1400 = $135) more than standard moderators. But since the bounties HR database is only concerned about curators’ paychecks, the value of $135 was retained as the data to enter in **this specific database**.

You also said “this is just one example, but there are more.” However, the 2 times I have had such comments, it turned out that it was just a misunderstanding from the readers. I have drawn the lessons from these occurrences in [this forum post](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/devrel-hr-teams-programs-costs-tenure-and-status/13095/6). Please give it a read and let me know if that is something that could help you and others make better sense of what OpenGov HR is and does.

Many thanks! 


I support this TIP and the current work. Even working now fulltime since one year in this ecosystem, I often have to ask around for the right contact and search through OpenGov. Now the registry is now at my top bookmarks!
PS: I don't mind it's on Notion. But it would be good to leave comments.


[@Eric](1NUuRnRKayAxnswLiFFzdM1rzqyLGLEZ1Fr9ugecfV4hzyD-polkadot) 

Hello Eric,

This is great to hear, thank you! 

There is a lot more in store coming up for this HR project, but I am glad that it is working reasonably well for you in its current state. 😃

I am not sure if you are aware, but anybody with a Notion account already has the option to fully duplicate the databases or leave a comment to request changes/amendments. 

![image.png](https://subsquare.infura-ipfs.io/ipfs/QmeUnYdibUjPBezGu8SX1P6tZkUmGQKW18mWentnqo8hrt)
![image.png](https://subsquare.infura-ipfs.io/ipfs/QmPvRecHZtcuHdrA2ZcoAdWnQJZDXordj1jJLTiH6HjvLp)

Please let me know if there is anything else that would improve the ease-of-access and navigation. 

Thanks! 🙏🏿


PolkaWorld votes AYE.

Although the data is manually compiled by a single person, I still find it quite helpful—at least for me personally. It clearly shows which Bounties exist in the ecosystem, who the curators are, and what their compensation is. It also includes an overview of existing DevRel agents across the ecosystem. Overall, I believe this information provides value and is worth supporting with a tip!

You can view the full feedback [here](https://southern-manicure-6ee.notion.site/1643-Tip-to-Anaelle-LTD-for-the-creation-of-the-DevRel-HR-database-226a3c644fba80dd9fa8fc5bff320279?source=copy_link).

[@polkaworld](12mP4sjCfKbDyMRAEyLpkeHeoYtS5USY4x34n9NMwQrcEyoh-polkadot) 

Hello team Polkaworld,

Thank you very much for your feedback and support! 🙏🏿

I will continue to optimise the data and presentation of OpenGov HR on a weekly basis to ensure that they remain up-to-date for visitors and users. 

That said, more input from the projects themselves would help speed up the current cadence, so that a comprehensive HR directory is available to inform/support ecosystem teams BEFORE [Solidity smart contracts](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/major-milestone-for-solidity-smart-contracts-first-part-of-the-preview-release-now-live-on-kusama/13506) go live on Polkadot later this year. 


**JAM Implementers DAO** votes **AYE** on this proposal

This is a funding request for a structured record of treasury-funded DevRel teams and costs across the Polkadot ecosystem. The work is already done. It’s hosted on OpenGov HR, and the deliverable helps bring visibility and accountability to ecosystem spending—something the community sorely needs more of.  While one of our DAO flagged the possibility of AI automating this and more in the future, that doesn’t diminish the value of the work already completed.  A small, justified request with tangible output.

[@JAM Implementers DAO](13NCLd3foNpsv1huPDzvvfyKh37NEEkGFotZnP52CTR98YFJ-polkadot) 

Hello JAM DAO,

Thank you very much for the support! 

Indeed, these databases are only proposed as a medium term solution to facilitate HR coordination in the ecosystem, in anticipation for the launch of Polkadot Hub.

I am aware that there are at least 3 different projects looking to use AI to improve OpenGov for users/participants, but I am yet to come across any proposal specifically focused on HR (aka the people) itself as opposed to Operations (aka the processes). 

Still, I am hoping that this (approved) Big tipper referendum will signal to competent builders that there is an opportunity here to build a long-lasting valuable product for the ecosystem and the industry at large.

Thank you! 🌞

This is a request for a retroactive tip totalling $2,380 ($85 x 28 hours) for the time Anaelle LTD spent structuring, populating, and updating a database hosted at [OpenGov HR](https://polkadotopengovhr.notion.site/):

- [DevRel HR](https://polkadotopengovhr.notion.site/1a9e13650f908045ae58ee06867cd28c?v=1a9e13650f9080d7aeed000c6f54a7e1): An overview of treasury-funded DevRel teams, programs, and costs in the Polkadot ecosystem. (28 hours)

This retroactive proposal was previously announced in the original [Polkadot forum post](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/devrel-hr-teams-programs-costs-tenure-and-status/13095).

The on-chain proposal will be made for payment in USDC.

- Anaelle LTD worked for 28 hours on a database for DevRel HR.  
- The database is about Polkadot's DevRel teams and costs.  
- They are asking for $2,380 (28 hours x $85).  
- Payment will be in USDC.  
- The work was announced earlier on Polkadot's forum.

assetKind

amount

beneficiary

validFrom

Executed

Submitted

DecisionDepositPlaced

DecisionStarted

ConfirmStarted

Confirmed

big_tipper

**Tip to Anaelle LTD for the creation of the DevRel HR database**

root

whitelisted_caller

wish_for_change

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

small_spender

medium_spender

big_spender

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.