Hopefully this conversation about invulnerable slots can be continued and not dismissed because this is relevant to the future of Polkadot public execution layers, specially the ones that will expect high transactionality and that expect a revamp in the short term future i.e. Plaza/AssetHub/PolkadotHub. We view this a necessary conversation to have specially if Plaza/AssetHub/PolkadotHub goes live which it’s expected to gather high transactionality and applications right off the bat. For Plaza/AssetHub/PolkadotHub  the number of concentrated invulnerable collators within single entities (including Parity) should be reconsidered and even planned for a complete removal likely in favor of 100% permissionless collators (or at least as close to 100% we can move to). This should be kept within the realm of possibilities, discussed and planned in advance, hopefully with a gradual test on Kusama first. 
 
For now we will vote AYE on this Polkadot referendum to maintain the operations on Polkadot uninterrupted but we will move the big discussion about this topic to Kusama and the Polkadot forum so hopefully we hear your participation over there.
https://forum.polkadot.network/t/discontinuation-or-minimization-of-invulnerable-collators-on-system-chainsplaza-assethub-polkadothub/11502

[@Saxemberg Governance](/user/11fx8xKPNd4zVSBxkpN8qhhaGEmNJvPgKqwhDATZQXs7dkM) 
Thank you for supporting the bounty and recognizing the importance of separating Bounty operational aspects from broader system chain design discussions. 

Since the forum post may be unclear regarding the matter, I want to clarify that both invulnerable and permissionless collators are included in this bounty. 

For ongoing discussions regarding system collator selection and related topics, please refer to:
-  [RFC-0007: System Collator Selection](https://polkadot-fellows.github.io/RFCs/approved/0007-system-collator-selection.html)
- [Economic Model for System Para Collators](https://forum.polkadot.network/t/economic-model-for-system-para-collators/1010) 

Please refer to these two sources, as they discuss the existing system collator setup and its reasoning. Other related documents and links on this topic are already included in the proposal.

Dear [@Coinstudio](/user/14d2kv44xf9nFnYdms32dYPKQsr5C9urbDzTz7iwU8iHb9az),

Thank you for your proposal. Our vote on this proposal is **AYE**.

The **Medium Spender** track requires **50% quorum and simple majority** according to our voting policy. This proposal has received **seven aye and zero nay** votes from ten members, with **one member abstaining**. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

> The referendum received strong support, with members emphasizing the necessity of supporting system parachain collators and recognizing the involved team as trustworthy and well-established in the ecosystem. Some acknowledged concerns around invulnerable slots but expressed confidence in future improvements. One member abstained due to a conflict of interest but acknowledged the proposal's rationale. Overall, the proposal was widely seen as a necessary and fair initiative.

The full discussion can be found in our [internal voting](https://voting.opensquare.io/space/permanence/proposal/QmV6ECETKZBNkR6Tao2T2FLn87i1YttKzWWDzzctZ22Yxs).

Kind regards,<br>Permanence DAO

**DISCLAIMER:** Our members, Polkadotters, who are one of the operators, have abstained from voting on this internal referendum.

**Proposal: Additional Funding for Polkadot System Parachain Collators**

**Requested allocation:** 21,504.94 DOT

**Bounty #32 DOT address**: 13UVJyLnbVp9RBZYFwHYxaA7NBbKRCL4bLMscV5JwwLTVE6j

This proposal seeks additional funding to support the operational status and provide a bounty top-up budget for collators on Polkadot's System Parachains. Collators are essential for maintaining network security, decentralization, and performance. While previous referenda have successfully provided the necessary resources for their effective operation, additional funds are required to sustain these efforts and adapt to the expanding network demands.

This proposal will focus on the operational status and the bounty top-up budget, while more detailed information can be found under the bounty page and in earlier proposals, as listed below.

**Full Proposal:** [Google Document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TeeGoG29HouQ04FaWk2d1ln0AvAf0kA3SASvXQwM0ns/edit?usp=sharing)

The history of initiatives for Polkadot System Chain collators dates back to mid-2023. They have provided vital support for maintaining the network’s stability, security, and decentralization.

-   **Referendum 156:** [Polkadot System Parachain Collators - Tips, August 2023](156)
-   **Referendum 288:** [Polkadot System Parachain Collators - Tips Q4/2023, September 2023](288)
-   **Referendum 363:** [Funding of Polkadot System Parachain Collators, December 2023](363)
-   **Referendum 1006:** [Proposal for Top-Up for Funding of Polkadot System Parachain Collators, June 2024](1006)

Thank you!

A proposal has been made to give more money to help the people called "collators" on Polkadot's System Parachains. Collators are important because they help keep the network safe, fair, and fast. They need more money to keep doing their job well as the network grows bigger. The proposal asks for 21,504.94 DOT to help with this. You can find more information about the proposal in a Google Document and in earlier proposals. This proposal is a way to say thank you to the collators for their hard work.

Polkadot System Parachains Collator Bounty #32 Top-Up Proposal - Jan/2025