good..if there is spanish, there should be all language

This proposal is about remove curators from Spanish Bounty.

Contrary to what is stated in the proposal, we as a curator team firmly believe that the existence of regional bounties serves the community well, and we welcome the existence of other bounties in different regions and languages to amplify the ecosystem message in the different communities and regions. 

Furthermore, we do not believe that the bounty overlaps with the activities of other bounties, but rather, contrary to what is proposed, it complements them.

The bounty has not been ineffective and has allowed the visibility of creators in the Spanish-speaking ecosystem. 

And in fact, this bounty V2 is the second that exists in Spanish, since the Bounty V1 was a proposal in Kusama and finish during the year 2023. 

Here is The Spanish Bounty V1 (2023) proposal: https://kusama.polkassembly.io/motion/568 and its report here: https://spanishbounty.com/

The bounty v2 was approved with a renewed and expanded curator team in Polkadot:  https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/referenda/532

Should be taken into account that the bounty is less than two months old, with these results to date: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dK_okc9XRhK_IyyJDzrm-13ru6APeZ9wxT6TVBYfx8w/edit?gid=2035168095#gid=2035168095

Also, all curations are public and can be viewed here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G7YYDWLXSSVnxHxZy0hZSG-0WfeR-AE_qc57CbtgCLM/edit?usp=sharing

And child bounty payments can be viewed here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XqEleVoa63Gdhb60Da1P2mn3O_VMEToaRHnlBncl6_E/edit?usp=sharing

In addition, the Spanish bounty V2 has a Discord channel open to the entire community where the community can find the rules, content, criteria and all other data of interest including the threads with each contribution: https://discord.gg/A3aMjPPB and there is a X account: https://x.com/Bountyenespanol

[@Giotto](1EpEiYpWRAWmte4oPLtR5B1TZFxcBShBdjK4X9wWnq2KfLK-polkadot) 

We welcome any suggestions for displaying information about submitted proposals, curation, rewarded funds, and reports in a clearer and more optimized way. This will help us improve communication and transparency with the community regarding the progress of the bounty.

Dear curators,

It has been suggested several times that the curator team's practice of signing and issuing Child bounties is highly ineffective. The constant spamming of the ChildBounty IDs negatively influences other bounties. In practice, this means on average 3-4 payments each day where every payment is issued and signed as a separate call. This is 105 extrinsic over 30 days. For comparison, a single Spanish bounty on Kusama owns 40% of all Kusama Child bounties. This is just out of proportion. Issuing daily payments of as low as $50 feels like curators are trying to create extra work for themselves.

We have suggested to the team to start batching the calls and start doing weekly or monthly payments as it is a common practice of every other Bounty. It seems this argument is turned down and the spamming continues.

This is now logged as the [issue on GitHub](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/4947).

 Because of this practice, I will support this proposal to replace the current curator set.

This bounty has always been very criticized as ineffective and self-serving. I see no apparent reason why there should be a specific Spanish bounty, then we should also have a Chinese bounty, Indian Bounty, French bounty, etc. Most of the activities covered by this bounty are already covered by other bounties like events bounty, marketing bounty, etc with much better management and oversight. I think it's time to clean up this bounty because of its ineffectiveness and controversy in the ecosystem. We could also consider replacing the curators with more effective ones (I'm not saying that all of them are ineffective, I'm sure that some of them in the current bounty are very effective but they may be slowed down by ineffective ones, similar to old events bounty). I'm happy to have a conversation with the current curators to understand if this bounty can be salvaged or it's better to terminate it since anyway all the actions it is undertaking already exist under more generic bounties Instead of killing the bounty directly I am proposing to remove the curators so this is like a prelude to either replacing the curators or terminating the bounty in a second referendum

The Spanish bounty has been criticized for being ineffective and self-serving. Some people think there should be bounties for other countries too, like China, India, and France. Many activities in the Spanish bounty are already covered by other bounties, like events and marketing bounties, which are managed better. People suggest cleaning up the Spanish bounty because it's not working well and has problems. They also think some curators should be replaced with more effective ones. The person who wrote this wants to talk to the current curators to see if the bounty can be fixed or if it's better to end it. They propose removing the curators first, which could lead to either replacing them or ending the bounty later.

bountyId

Rejected

Submitted

DecisionDepositPlaced

DecisionStarted

treasurer

WHO: The proposal does not mention any specific organization or individual.

WHAT: The proposal suggests cleaning up the Spanish bounty due to its ineffectiveness and controversy in the ecosystem. It proposes removing the curators and replacing them with more effective ones.

PRICE/TIMEFRAME/RESOURCES: The proposal does not mention any specific price, timeframe, or resources.

Removing curators from Spanish bounty

root

whitelisted_caller

wish_for_change

staking_admin

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

big_tipper

small_spender

medium_spender

big_spender

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.