Referendum #914

Ecosystem Agent Tip for Adam Steeber's bounty & multisig tutorial

Big Tipper
9 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
1,000DOT
Status
Decision7d
Confirmation1hr
Attempts
1
Tally
62.3%Aye
50.0%Threshold
37.7%Nay
Aye
14.26MDOT
Nay
8.61MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.22%)
3.18MDOT
Issuance
1.44BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline6
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments
Sort by
Oldest
[Deleted Account]

We really appreciate Adam for his initiative and the great video he made, however we want to highlight a flaw in this process:

If someone wants to contribute to the ecosystem from his own good will then it's totally fine and fully appreciated. However, if the purpose of this contribution is to claim afterwards a payment retrospectively, then the order should be exactly the opposite. Meaning, you first propose what you want to do and ask for the required payment, and if the community agrees it's necessary, then it should be approved and the proposer can start to work

Personally I prefer to avoid a situation where many people start to take their own initiatives, do their job, and after they finish ask for a payment. That's our main reason for voting against this proposal since it's not a regular tip for something made "out of the blue", but a payment for a job that was planned to do in order to claim the payment afterwards

Reply
Up