Requesting "Top Up" of Ref #601 due to DOT price change

In referendum #601 we requested a total of $485,000 with the day's EMA7 of $9.544. This was a total of 50,817.27 DOT. When received at the end of the spending period the EMA7 was $6.88 and we only received $350,027. A difference of $134,973.

In referendum #883 we are requesting a total of 25,000 DOT to cover this price difference with a buffer to protect against further price volatility.

At posting the EMA7 for today is $6.38 which is a total of 21,155.64 DOT for $134,973. We have added a ~15% buffer on this (3,844.36 DOT). At the time of payment when the spending period ends in ~36 days the amount will be recalculated at the EMA7 for that day and any excess refunded to the treasury account listed below.

13UVJyLnbVp9RBZYFwFGyDvVd1y27Tt8tkntv6Q7JVPhFsTB

TIA!

Edited
Reply
Up
Share
Request
25,000DOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation
4d
Attempts
0
Tally
38.3%Aye
61.7%Nay
Aye
18.93MDOT
Nay
30.45MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.24%
3.49MDOT
Issuance
1.44BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Or do delegation here, check wiki.
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments
[Deleted Account]

I support the top-up request due to the recent change in DOT price. However, to ensure the request is justified, I propose that proof of conversion of the DOT within a reasonable timeframe be provided. This will help verify that the need for the top-up is due to legitimate fluctuations in the market and not due to prolonged holding of tokens, which could be seen as market price speculation. Without such evidence, it is challenging to validate the necessity of this request.

Reply
Up 2