Threshold
Using the root track, that is better suited for important technical changes, to re-submit your proposal that was rejected, without any change, is very out of touch and arrogant. Strong nay from me.
Chainanalysis has already show their true colours from the company they keep, they got rejected fair and square and now want to go on the root track. This is bad business any way you cut it.
reproposing essentially the same thing immediately after getting rejected the first time is crazy
first time voting on a referenda and im proud to vote no on this.
Shame on you CHAINALYSIS and the gang
We should freeze or burn the accounts of those evil whales
You've made no changes and literally got rejected on this proposal only hours ago.
The community clearly isn't a fan of your first approach so now you do this? Who advised you this was a good idea.
I cannot believe anyone would recommend this approach.