Chainalysis analytics solutions on Polkadot Network

Cancelled

Root Proposal

We have decided to resubmit the proposal through the root track due to its strategic significance and the privacy concerns it addresses, which have been voiced as a concern. This proposal is not merely about financial expenditure; it encompasses broader implications that require careful consideration. We believe that the root track is the most suitable and comprehensive platform for presenting such an important referendum.

For a complete proposal, please refer to the following — link

Previous proposal #684 — link

Video Resolving Previous Discussion — link

Doubts Q&A from Previous Debates — link

 

Based on community feedback, we announce the following improvements compared to the previous referendum:

  • Prioritizing onboarding for Moonbeam
  • Upgrading support tier: Support will be extended from Gold to Platinum
  • Doubling ongoing case support hours: The allocation for ongoing case support will increase from 200 hours to 400 hours
  • Tripling training capacity: The number of people eligible for training will expand from 10 to 30, allowing more team members to benefit from our programs.
  • Increasing investigation licenses: The number of licenses for investigative solutions will be increased from 5 to 7
Reply
Up
Share
Request
1MDOT
Tally
95%Aye
100.0%Threshold
5%Nay
Aye
66.05MDOT
Nay
3.49MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
1.37%
19.43MDOT
Issuance
1.42BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline2
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments
[Deleted Account]

You've made no changes and literally got rejected on this proposal only hours ago.

The community clearly isn't a fan of your first approach so now you do this? Who advised you this was a good idea.

I cannot believe anyone would recommend this approach.

Reply
Up 3
[Deleted Account]

Using the root track, that is better suited for important technical changes, to re-submit your proposal that was rejected, without any change, is very out of touch and arrogant. Strong nay from me.

Reply
Up
[Deleted Account]

Chainanalysis has already show their true colours from the company they keep, they got rejected fair and square and now want to go on the root track. This is bad business any way you cut it.

Reply
Up
[Deleted Account]

reproposing essentially the same thing immediately after getting rejected the first time is crazy

first time voting on a referenda and im proud to vote no on this.

Reply
Up
[Deleted Account]

Shame on you CHAINALYSIS and the gang

Reply
Up 1
[Deleted Account]

We should freeze or burn the accounts of those evil whales

Reply
Up