Root Proposal
We have decided to resubmit the proposal through the root track due to its strategic significance and the privacy concerns it addresses, which have been voiced as a concern. This proposal is not merely about financial expenditure; it encompasses broader implications that require careful consideration. We believe that the root track is the most suitable and comprehensive platform for presenting such an important referendum.
For a complete proposal, please refer to the following — link
Previous proposal #684 — link
Video Resolving Previous Discussion — link
Doubts Q&A from Previous Debates — link
Based on community feedback, we announce the following improvements compared to the previous referendum:
Threshold
Using the root track, that is better suited for important technical changes, to re-submit your proposal that was rejected, without any change, is very out of touch and arrogant. Strong nay from me.
Chainanalysis has already show their true colours from the company they keep, they got rejected fair and square and now want to go on the root track. This is bad business any way you cut it.
reproposing essentially the same thing immediately after getting rejected the first time is crazy
first time voting on a referenda and im proud to vote no on this.
Shame on you CHAINALYSIS and the gang
We should freeze or burn the accounts of those evil whales
You've made no changes and literally got rejected on this proposal only hours ago.
The community clearly isn't a fan of your first approach so now you do this? Who advised you this was a good idea.
I cannot believe anyone would recommend this approach.