Referendum #783

Developer tools for Polkadot-API

Medium Spender
8 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
31,705DOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation4d
Attempts
1
Tally
56.2%Aye
50.0%Threshold
43.8%Nay
Aye
9.97MDOT
Nay
7.76MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.15%)
2.1MDOT
Issuance
1.43BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline6
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments
Sort by
Oldest
[Deleted Account]

The proposal emphasizes recreating functionalities already available in existing tools like Polkadot.js UI. Instead of duplicating efforts, resources could be better spent on enhancing or expanding the current tools. No substantial evidence or data shows a strong demand from the Polkadot developer community for the proposed tool. Without clear demand, the tool might see low adoption, rendering the effort and resources invested ineffective.

Reply
Up
[Deleted Account]

Hello from Polkadotters.
In general, the proposal is well structured and we appreciate the milestone approach. We are curious if this can't fit into the DeFi Infrastructure & Tooling Bounty.
Considering the plans to implement additional features based on community feedback, what mechanisms will you use to collect, prioritize, and integrate this feedback effectively into the development cycle?

Reply
Up