I am not sure to understand the intention correctly. You mention that this could be a replacement for crowd-loans to gather project funding - yes. But how does it relate to treasury grants?  
Getting a nomination-based % of inflation is not a very strong promise for grantees. I think in this case, it would still be better to have Treasury instalments, that pays out grants in chunks on a monthly basis. This still gives the Treasury the possibility to intervene on non-delivering projects.

Also what is the priority on this? Expected timeline? *How* important do the voters think this feature is on a scale 1/10?

[@OLIVER ⚡/ggwpez](13TRAXTALwNp5vApqwiE74fg8G8ypMyaF9TxRfs4RwrCwxUE-polkadot) This is not a replacement for conventional Treasury funding or grants, those will continue to be available where they are the most appropriate method of funding - this is an additional stream that aims to incentivise people to build on Polkadot. But more importantly it incentivises people to build **useful** products that **provide value** to DOT token holders - as the products that provide most value will most likely get a larger portion of the optimistic funding.

just for a begining, after diverses criteras of valuations to be determined by specialists seem necessary and suggest a temporality of try at verification all the year or by 6 or 3 month, but its optimitic and a good first step try.

And is a few amount of dot. 

Because 4.96* 365 = 1810/YEARS 12.55 * 365 = 4580.75/YEARS so if estimate the minimum cost of Dot at 6 and 8  dollars in bear  is correct because between 1810* 6 = 10860 dollars or 14480 * 8 and 4580.75 *6  = 27480 dollars and 36640 dollars * 8.

I do not take into account the future inflation effect about Agile Coretime update nor a non-sustainable effect accentuated by a bull market climax.

If stay thus, is the responsability of dev to convert if increase or decrease value of dot however. So manage yourself  our budget.

 Is not bad proposition. 

I don't get this. Especially the bribe reward part. Someone votes to get your project funded via treasury and then gets rewarded for that? In other words I invest with money from someone else, but I get the rewards, if any. Or even more to the point:

1. I get the profit.
2. The treasury takes the risk.

I think a proposal similar to this might make sense for real common good (not for profit) projects, but anything that is for profit should just convince the same DOT holders to actually invest their DOT, not someone else's DOT. I really hope, I am misunderstanding something here, given that the proposal already passed.

**Short description:** Allow for users to nominate whitelisted projects with their DOT - this mechanism will be funded with a constant stream of DOT taken directly from inflation and distributed to projects based on the proportion of DOT that has nominated them.

Full proposal details can be found [here on Google docs](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cl6CpWyqX7NCshV0aYT5a8ZTm75PWcLrEBcfk2I1tAA/edit) or the IPFS saved PDF [here](https://gray-revolutionary-porpoise-924.mypinata.cloud/ipfs/QmcrgBLqKBDB7WEiqNoy6Z8yJtCdqANuNMB9hcHeoQcz8d).

Telegram discussion group: @parachainstaking

**Summary:**

- Users can nominate projects with their DOT tokens.
- Nominated projects receive funding from a constant stream of DOT taken from inflation.
- Funding is distributed based on the proportion of DOT used to nominate each project.
- Full details are available in a Google Docs document or an IPFS-saved PDF.
- There is a Telegram discussion group for this proposal: @parachainstaking.

remark

Executed

Submitted

DecisionDepositPlaced

DecisionStarted

ConfirmStarted

Confirmed

wish_for_change

**WHO:** Parachainstaking

**WHAT:** Allow users to nominate whitelisted projects with DOT, funded by a constant stream of DOT taken from inflation and distributed to projects based on the proportion of DOT that has nominated them.

**PRICE/TIMEFRAME/RESOURCES:** Not specified.

Implement Optimistic Project Funding

root

whitelisted_caller

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

big_tipper

small_spender

medium_spender

big_spender

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.