Referendum #599

Polkadot P2P Network Health Weekly Reports

Small Spender
14 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
5,600DOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation2d
Attempts
1
Tally
59.6%Aye
50.0%Threshold
40.4%Nay
Aye
24.14MDOT
Nay
16.36MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.29%)
4.07MDOT
Issuance
1.4BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline6
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments
Sort by
Oldest
[Deleted Account]

Dear team,

We agree with @ROTKO.NET here in regards of the need to have better insights at the p2p levels so the overall networking mechanism can be improved, however, the sample report shown is somehow too "executive" for the goal...

We are voting Aye with the expectation of seeing lees aggregated data in the report and more nitty-gritty analyses which are actionable (e.g. main causes for disconnection, problems in bidirectional reachability, peer discovery obstacles, aspects hindering network latencies, problems with old peer retention in tables, etc).. all of those seemingly complex enough and volatile enough that cannot be automated in a report like the one shown.

ALSO, IMPORTANT!: please make sure that your accounts have verified on-chain identities and that the decision deposit is also covered.

Best of luck and please bring on your magnifier glass to the p2p network!

Milos

Edited

Reply
Up
[Deleted Account]

Hello from Polkadotters!
Please consider fully verifying your identity, right now your identity is without judgment. This will make your suggestion more trustworthy.
This is an interesting initiative, we will dig a bit into it and consider voting in the next few days.

Reply
Up
[Deleted Account]

Hi @Polkadotters

good news, it took a few people internally troubleshooting and debugging due to the last upgrade on dot but it finally allowed us to complete the verification on chain

Reply
Up