Polkadot Ambassador Program

Root
34 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up 1
Share
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation1d
Attempts
1
Tally
94.2%Aye
50.0%Threshold
5.8%Nay
Aye
32.61MDOT
Nay
2.01MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.75%)
10.36MDOT
Issuance
1.38BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline6
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments
Sort by
Oldest
[Deleted Account]

Orderliness and structuring are often positive decisions that have a beneficial impact on the final outcome. However, it's currently unclear why the previously proposed "Fellowship-like program" was transformed into this one. I can see several disadvantages of the new program:

  • Lack of clear criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of HAs and other ambassadors' work. What work by HAs is evaluated at 10k/month? Why this specific amount? And if HAs get 10k, why SAs and others have to seek their rewards via treasury?
  • A small number of Head ambassadors could accumulate too much power and control over the program, potentially leading to uneven resource distribution or skewed priorities (look at the current vote).
  • The program in its current state fails to provide motivation and retention mechanisms for participants, which will lead to the departure of talented individuals or a lack of motivation among current participants.

In my opinion, the program is not yet ready for implementation.

Reply
Up
[Deleted Account]

This is not Polkadot Ambassador Program, it is Hunger Games of Polkadot.

This bringing nothing but harm for the Polkadot. Strongly against the vision and vibe provided with this and other Proposals. It is eroding what was done for years. Not creating, or improving but destroying.

I as Head Ambassador skipping this and vote NAY.

Polkadot Head Ambassador's proposal how to solve it here - https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-ambassadors-call-to-return-to-gavin-s-vision-of-the-program/6269/9

Edited

Reply
Up
[Deleted Account]

“He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom.”

Reply
Up 1
[Deleted Account]

I have recently had conversations with a number of ambassadors, seniors, and head ambassadors. Most of the people I spoke with are frustrated and disappointed with the vision presented by the author of this proposal.

The only way to save the Polkadot ambassador program is to go back to the roots, rethink the list of head ambassadors (including active seniors and respected veterans and excluding those who are not active or refuse to join), and vote collectively (as a whole initial list at once). Reduce the HA rewards, return to the original reward system (+ ambassadors and seniors), and return to a vibe similar to the Fellowship (a long-term program to reward non-technical contributors).

Otherwise, current HA will lose the support and respect of the community. Respect and support is more important and valuable than $10K or even $100K per month.

I represent several HAs who are strongly opposed to the format of this initiative. We, as HAs, represent Polkadot more than the majority of the cynical DOT whales. The Polkadot Ambassador program (the idea behind it) needs to be in the hands of the head ambassadors, one way or another. No one should dictate our agenda. We will do what we have done for years and we will get the resources to continue doing things in the name of the community, not just whales.

The head ambassadors' initial seeding needs to be approved by a list, not on an individual basis. Otherwise, it could go wrong and fall into the hands of random people who have not contributed to this ecosystem for years.

Whales, please leave the Polkadot ambassador program alone and go your own way as cynical merchants. Give us the ability to build the Web3 community we want and in the way we want, to create new productive connections and friendships. We don't want to be speculators or your sales team, or BD team and we don't think only about pushing prices up.

Reply
Up 1
[Deleted Account]

This is a program that we do for ambassadors, but it's ambassadors that say that this program does not help. I vote nay.

Reply
Up
[Deleted Account]

Now, it's clear that nobody, except for a few of the Head Ambassadors, really cares about the program. It was whale attempt to get more funding under control. Ambassadors are not silent.

I believe it's time for the Ambassadors to step in and take matters into their own hands. Program is belong to Ambassadors, not greedy and unprofessional whales. I don't want this program turn another DED shit.

Reply
Up 1