Hi,

I believe that for an ask of this size, a clear and quantified value proposition and flexible planning supported by a strong feedback cycle are pretty much required. This way, a small number of well-reputed curators can guide their judgement. So it seems like I'm pretty much in the opposite camp to the "non-method" offered by this proposal. Good luck!

kukabi | Helikon


UPDATE:

1) [https://x.com/giottodf/status/1755499400598528458?s=20](https://x.com/giottodf/status/1755499400598528458?s=20)

2) Join the chat:

[https://t.me/dotgamesbounty](https://t.me/dotgamesbounty)

Very important: Read the pinned message to understand exactly how it works when you join the chat

\=============

\====> [https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/bounty/38](../bounty/38)

bountyId

Executed

Submitted

DecisionDepositPlaced

DecisionStarted

ConfirmStarted

Confirmed

medium_spender

Games Bounty [38]

root

whitelisted_caller

wish_for_change

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

big_tipper

small_spender

big_spender

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.