If Giotto thinks Hector should receive tip for helping him to vote (even so he didn't even vote on REF#379) he should tip him himself.... Stop acting as DOT Treasury is your bags.

This tip is for [Hector Bulgarini's Analysis on Proposal #379: NFT XCM](<379#X3ST121Z0R0p9CvsmyNj>) which follows this [template:](<https://twitter.com/giottodf/status/1746401243403043295?s=46&t=qKV5hT_Ds4kNwzNTZpvU4w>)

- Abstract: what it's about, this is important so that people can decide if they should keep reading or not most likely if it's outside of their circle of competence they will move on to the next proposal at this stage

- Prior art: how things are currently being done without this proposal being in existence

- Projected prior art: how the future would look like without this change / innovation / addition / proposal

- Context: how this is relevant in the bigger context, related to what is already there, what is currently being planned by other parties, what is currently being done, etc

- Why: why is it needed? What is the business case?

- Trade-offs: what are the trade-offs compared to alternative solutions that may already exist or may not yet exist but are different? Including theoretical only










Tips for [DOT Experts](https://t.me/dotxpert) are intended to reward experts who provide detailed analyses for OpenGov voters to make political decisions. DOT Experts should never express political preferences, and instead characterize decisions in terms of tradeoffs.

Background:

- Hector did work on [Trappist](<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eJwzbtqZYs>) which concerns XCM NFT Interoperability.

- [Proposal #379: NFT XCM](<379>) aims to make **XCM NFT Interoperability** production grade across all parachains in the Polkadot ecosystem.


## Request for DOT Experts!

Ready to help OpenGov voters make informed political decisions?

Join the [DOT Experts Telegram Group](https://t.me/dotxpert)

- The document is about Hector Bulgarini's analysis of Proposal #379, which focuses on making NFTs work better across different platforms in the Polkadot ecosystem.
- It explains why the proposal is important for people deciding whether to read more.
- It describes how things currently work without this proposal.
- It imagines what the future will look like if the proposal isn't adopted.
- The context shows how this proposal relates to other ongoing projects.
- It discusses why this proposal is needed and its business importance.
- It also looks at the trade-offs compared to other possible solutions.
- Finally, there's a call for experts to help voters make informed decisions.

amount

beneficiary

Executed

Submitted

DecisionDepositPlaced

DecisionStarted

ConfirmStarted

Confirmed

big_tipper

Proposal #379: NFT XCM aims to make XCM NFT Interoperability production grade across all parachains in the Polkadot ecosystem. No specific price, timeframe, or resources mentioned.

DOT Experts Tip for Hector Bulgarini for Proposal #379: NFT XCM

root

whitelisted_caller

wish_for_change

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

small_spender

medium_spender

big_spender

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.