Referendum #24

Proposal: ink! design security review by OpenZeppelin (treasury proposal 2/2)

Given the successful completion of OpenZeppelin’s security review of the ink! smart contract language & Substrate’s smart contracts pallet, this community proposal is for the second installment supporting OpenZeppelin’s work. During this engagement, OpenZeppelin identified 11 total issues within the codebase. We are pleased to report that working with the Parity team throughout this process has been fantastic.

The finalized report can be found on OpenZeppelin’s blog: https://blog.openzeppelin.com/security-review-ink-cargo-contract/

The ink! team has acknowledged all issues. Two of the ink! issues have been solved, seven of the cargo-contract suggestions have been implemented; the rest are actively being addressed.

Full proposal here

Reply
Up
Share
Request
25,533DOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation
1d
Attempts
1
Tally
76.5%Aye
50.0%Threshold
23.5%Nay
Aye
1.55MDOT
Nay
476.2KDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.07%
774.18KDOT
Issuance
1.16BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments
No comments here