Referendum #181

Polkawatch, Decentralization Analytics, Continued Operation and Development

Medium Spender
12 Comments
Executed
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
12,115DOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation1d
Attempts
1
Tally
73.7%Aye
61.7%Threshold
26.3%Nay
Aye
31.64MDOT
Nay
11.3MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.92%)
10.92MDOT
Issuance
1.19BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline6
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments
Sort by
Oldest
[Deleted Account]

First I would like to give our criteria by which we vote.

Our votes are based on the logic of "do I think that the amount given out is worth the benefit that this proposal will ultimately bring to polkadot ecosystem."

And according to your proposal, our answer is no.

I don’t see that Polkadot has decentralization problem that we need to solve here and now. In my opinion, everything is relatively good with our staking mechanism, and everything is much worse on the part of the applications that will attract users.

This may sound quite unpleasant, but in my opinion the ecosystem should focus on attracting real users to the applications, and discard everything else in this bear market and the low price of dot.

I also think that most nominators just want one "nominate" button and forget about it, just receiving rewards. And as I understand, some mobile wallets are working on such solutions.

Sorry for the fact that you probably would like to hear a different answer.

Reply
Up