Hi there.
Polkassembly with the Subsquare are 2  major products of governance tool on Polkadot. Which is great.
However, I voted NAY on this proposal because:
1. The requested amount is unbelievably big. 
2. The request for $1,000,000 for a product that is hardly working after 2 years of development. It has constant annoying bugs, such as content not loading, loss of RPC, loss of connection with wallet, content shifting, and slow loading.

I should admit that in the last year, I personally submitted more than +25 bugs to the Polkassembly team (which is not great). However, some of the bugs were fixed very quickly.

I would suggest Polkassembly to:
1. Fix already knows bugs
2. Improve user workability
3. Lower the amount.


An additional questions to Polkassembly:
- 1. If the infrastructure cost req 92K\months, which means 92K*12=1,104,000$ only Infra cost, how can you request a lower amount?
- 2, Can you please share: statistical data of polkassembly: daily, weekly, monthly visitors, average session in min? 


Thank you.



Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is **NAY**.

The **Big Spender** track requires **60% quorum** according to our voting policy. This proposal has received **one aye and five nay** votes from **ten members**, with **one member abstaining**. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

> In the recent referendum, voters expressed concerns about the quality and functionality of Polkassembly, advocating for smaller, more focused proposals for improvement rather than a large upfront payment. Many highlighted the importance of the platform within the ecosystem, suggesting that its price tag should align more closely with similar products like Subsquare, which they viewed as superior. Overall, there was a strong desire for enhanced usability and performance from Polkassembly, reflecting a consensus for caution and incremental upgrades rather than substantial financial commitments.

The full discussion can be found in our [internal voting](https://voting.opensquare.io/space/permanence/proposal/QmZoAaGza6b99r6WSjHc3E6UGP2GyuYM19iqNNFb3kNQgB).

Kind regards, Permanence DAO

**NOTE** — _Due to some calculation errors and community feedback on the proposal, we have decided to withdraw the proposal in its current state and we plan to create a followup proposal incorporating the feedback and limited scope of development._ 

_We thank everyone who supported this proposal and look forward to everyone's support on the updated proposal._ 

_Regards,_

_Polkassembly Team_

assetKind

amount

beneficiary

validFrom

Rejected

Submitted

DecisionDepositPlaced

DecisionStarted

big_spender

NOTE &mdash; Due to some calculation errors and community feedback on the proposal, we have decided to withdraw the proposal in its current state and we plan to create a followup proposal incorporating the feedback and limited scope of development.&nbsp;
We thank everyone who supported this proposal and look forward to everyone's support on the updated proposal.&nbsp;
Regards,
Polkassembly Team

Please vote Nay

root

whitelisted_caller

wish_for_change

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

big_tipper

small_spender

medium_spender

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.