Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is **AYE**.

The **Medium Spender** track requires **50% quorum and simple majority of all voters** according to our voting policy. This proposal has received **five aye and two nay** votes from **ten members**, with **one member abstaining**. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

> In the referendum, some voters expressed concerns about the adequacy of legal professionals among the curators, while others believed the initiative should proceed to allow the bounty to demonstrate its potential. A few participants sought more information regarding the curators' qualifications before making a decision. Despite a split in support, a majority felt optimistic about the initiative's capacity to evolve and benefit the community, whereas some remained steadfast in their opposition, doubting the effectiveness of the proposed bounty system.

The full discussion can be found in our [internal voting](https://voting.opensquare.io/space/permanence/proposal/QmYPzLCADr8mbH5BDZ3ngcXbe4vaujqqRUrEStMPqpX17K).

Kind regards,<br>Permanence DAO

I consider the Legal Bounty should have lawyers as curators. For that reason I vote against the set of curators proposal.

Voting Yes.
I definitely agree that a legal bounty is needed and i think that the current set of curators is able to bootstrap the bounty. Anyway, for a follow up ref i would love to see what others have stated as well in the comments, mainly:
- legal experts / lawyers being part of the curators
- a more secure multisig setup

This proposal sets the curators for Bounty #62, which was approved by the Polkadot community in Referendum 1359.

We propose the following set of curators:
- DonDiegoSanchez: 1CRmVRcQymMpot855oKDq76kF19jJezMMkGcrvHh1ozEqXa
- CoinStudio: 13mUoL3pRW6JGtqkFf3Kzn2WEeqbuchtVMRziXdBxdF3Rn2f
- Matthias (Scytale): 16AeKTW38GKFT3rRMzU6kMGARf7zTAF4jt8AvNxrUJpiQrJG
- Amforc: 14dQPQ8eKWKPwY8r2AaNrtY5SZrEK3tLpMWZefsNCfpehaQG

These curators will operate via a 2-of-4 multisig. Following the discussion of our proposal in the community and addressing an often mentioned concern of too few curators, we are happy that [Matthias from Scytale Digital](https://www.scytale.digital/members/matthias-tarasiewicz) offered to serve as an additional curator compared to our original suggestion in Referendum 1359.

- Bounty #62 curators are chosen by the Polkadot community.
- Four curators are proposed: DonDiegoSanchez, CoinStudio, Matthias (Scytale), and Amforc.
- They will work together using a 2-of-4 multisig system.
- Matthias joined as an extra curator after community feedback.

bountyId

curator

Executed

Submitted

DecisionDepositPlaced

DecisionStarted

ConfirmStarted

Confirmed

medium_spender

Set Curators for Legal Bounty

root

whitelisted_caller

wish_for_change

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

big_tipper

small_spender

big_spender

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.