Hello Everyone,

First of all, I will briefly state what treasury is and the problem that is currently beginning to arise in my opinion. I know too that all the tresory can be spend.

What is polkadot treasury? Money from Dot inflation come from shared stake security , therefore created ex nihilo for auto maintain the security of network. 1% or 2% of his inflation go to the tresure.

It is logical that some people push you to vote for certain delegations to better divert funds to their advantage.

Think carefully about all this clientelism being put in place for Open Gov, all these new delegates for the so-called community. Nothing is ever truly free.

You can have behind delegation a consortium creation who is represented by the delegate without display really the consortium, who, in reality have other goal than what it claims to display.

It will be also that Open Gov!

This isn't necessarily the case for everything, but that's what I'm starting to notice, that's just me obviously!

At least is judicious to prioritize certain financing according to their usefulness and their immediate importance for the ecosystem while associating limits on expenditure in relation to this hierarchical system of importance of proposals, by promulgating a hierarchy of themes and their possible financing without hindering the current timing of the vote ? Just an idea like that.

That say.

Here, I propose an idea of one of my posts just poted on subsocial or Grillapp.net concerning idea to create collective delegation vote on Open Gov 2.0.

In short, my suggestion concerns the creation of a new type of delegation centered on a grouping of collective voting power. Basically, each participants in this collective delegation must have strictly the same voting power, therefore strictly the same amount of DOTs. And must be coded within the governance protocol.

We could imagine a variable size in order to be able to opposes differents types of whale according to their voting power, therefore their wealth. Namely severals types of collectives delegations. The size of the stake is strictly equal for all participants and must be defined for each collective delegation created.

The goal here being the possibility of being able to oppose this excessive voting power coming from the great owners of wealth.

Knowing that staking favors the largest owners. The biggest bets naturally earn more DOTs even if the return is the same. 15% of 100 is not the same number of DOTs as 15% of 1000, 10000, 100,000 or 1 Million DOTs at the same yield. The return is equal but not equitable. Here I propose an equal collective for an effect of democratic balance, which is equitable.

The goal is not systematic opposition, but the possibility of doing so.

The whales, like the collective, can naturally take advantage of their power to seek control.

As everyone can think that a decision is the right one for everyone, when it is not, or cannot be applied according to their will alone. Moreover, this type of delegation could also be useful for larger collective investments on a project or access to more targeted projects for large portfolios.

This will consist of determining several collective delegations with a greater or lesser number of members, and, or, each must put exactly the same number of Dots into participation.

There would therefore be a statistically perfectly equal participation. Ultimately, this democratic rebalance will encourage the involvement of voters and small portfolios, who are naturally the most numerous. This will promote the attractiveness of new people interested in Polkadot Open Gov in the future, you can be sure.

This will really make it possible to democratize the legitimacy of Open Gov as a true democratic protocol.

This represent an esquisse. At least This could perhaps be the outline of a digital democratic model alternative to the voting systems of our current democracies which no longer have anything democratic in them.

But I'm no legit because no vote on polkadot Gov because of monopole vote for whale because their power of wealthy.

In my part, I will vote in Open Gov of Polkadot only if there is this type of possibility for the rebalance of democatic power between two possibles opposites sides inside the democratic Open Gov 2.0.

In definitive if the tresory should be spend in all of case, as much as it is for everyone no! (Whale, Dolphin, fish, shrimp! And for that we have need a reequilibrium of power inside Open Gov 2.0.

What do you think ?